1.      Watt, J. H., & van den Berg, S. (1981). How time dependency influences media effects in a community controversy. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 43-50.

1-5

2.      D. G. Taylor (1982). Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: A formal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 311-335.

3.      Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). The priming effect. In S. Iyengar & D. R. Kinder,News that matters: Television and American opinion (pp. 63-72, 144-147, 164-165), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4.      Potter, W. J. (1988). Three strategies for elaborating the cultivation hypothesis.Journalism Quarterly, 65, 930-939.

5.      Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.

6.      Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-42), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

7.      Kwak, N. (1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: Education, motivation, and media use. Communication Research, 26, 385-413.

8.      Sherry, J. (2001). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research. 27, 409-431.

142-164

9.      Venkatesh, V., etc. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.

88-141

10. Trumbo, C. W. (2004). Research methods in mass communication research: A census of eight journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 417-436.

11. Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662-704.

12. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.) (1991). Measures of political attitudes: Volume 2 of measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-36), San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Ch. 1, Scale selection and evaluation (pp. 1-36); Ch. 10, Political information (pp. 591-639).